motorul cu apa, alternativa la electric |
This topic is about motorul cu apa, the author, , wrote about: ... To read more just scroll down
motorul cu apa, alternativa la electric |
May 22 2008, 10:04 AM
Post
#1
|
|
workaholic * * * * * * Group: Moderator Posts: 11.052 Joined: 4-August 03 From: Bucuresti Member No.: 14.854 |
de ce nu masina cu motor pe apa : http://www.waterengine.org/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105788/ http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99086.htm http://bwt.jeffotto.com/bwt_catalogue/engine.htm http://www.ford.com/innovation/environment...iendly/hydrogen http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/newsarticle....;doc=maz0310282 "Hi I have been following the trail of potential water powered cars for a few years now, over this time I have compiled a list of successful inventors! Here they are! Andriah Puharich Archie blue Bob Boyce Carl Cella Charles H. Garrett Daniel Dingel Hector Pierre Vaes Nakamatsu Yoshiro Sam Leslie Leach Stanley Meyer Steven Horvarth And a few other unidentified people! The most noteable of these was Stanley Meyer who is dead unfortunatley! In fact so are Carl Cella & Hector Pierre Vaes all before there time and under suspicious cercumstances! The rest have either been threatend, sold out or keep to them selves! Apparently it's not a good idea to threaten Big Oil companys. An internet search will find info all of these individuals!" convert from gas to water : http://www.futurehorizons.net/hyd2a.htm -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 09:27 PM
Post
#2
|
|
specialist Group: Moderator Posts: 10.684 Joined: 29-March 04 From: Oradea (Bihor) Member No.: 23.122 |
Eu nu sunt foarte bun la fizica, dar totusi retin cateva chestii:
1. Apa in sine nu poate reprezenta un combustibil, nimic niciodata nu o sa mearga cu H20... cu H da... cu O posibil... dar cu H2O niciodata. Deci orice merge cu H2O defapt descopmune prin electroliza apa in elementele componente. 1.1 Daca defapt masina merge pe baza de hidrogen, nu ar fi mai eficient sa alimentezi direct cu hidrogen ? sunt convins ca hidrogenul ar putea fi produs mult mai eficient intr-o fabrica decat in interiorul unei masini. 2. Electroliza se face prin folosirea energiei electrice, daca tot folosim energia electrica, nu mai bine o folosim direct pentru propulsarea masinilor (aici as avea argumente si pro si contra, e mai ieftin sa folosim direct energia electrica (toti copii stiu ca tractorasul si ATV-ul de plastic e propulsat de energie electrica) dar probabil e mai putin poluant sa folosim hidrogen, intrucat nu exista baterii, iar bateriile polueaza). 3. Companiile petroliere nu ar falimenta in niciun caz... Voi credeti ca nu ar fi la fel de rentabil sa vanda hidrogen ? sau apa purificata ? sau suc de portocale ? sau cola ? Companiile petroliere vor trai foarte bine orice s-ar intampla pentru ca dispun de infrastuctura necesara alimentarii masinilor. Desigur ar fi un cost suplimentar convertirea de la benzina la hidrogen sau apa sfintita... dar pana la urma tot companiile petroliere ar fi in pole position in caz ca s-ar face trecerea la alt combustibil. 3.1 Biodieselul nu mai are legatura cu titeiul... si totusi se vinde la statiile companiilor petroliere, ele nu traiesc din scosul titeiului din pamant, ci din vandutul combustibilului... indiferent ca se numeste benzina, motorina, pipi de zana sau orice altceva. -------------------- Mercedes C320 CDI 4-matic
Audi A3 Sportback 1.9 TDI "Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you." -Jeremy Clarkson |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 09:57 AM |