IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Sisteme AWD, care e cel mai bun?

This topic is about Sisteme AWD, care e cel mai bun?, the author, Iulian HondaFan, wrote about: off-roaderele adevarate au 4WD nu AWD... ... To read more just scroll down

13 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sisteme AWD, care e cel mai bun?
Iulian HondaFan
post Nov 29 2005, 03:07 AM
Post #161


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 4.583
Joined: 30-May 04
From: Honda World
Member No.: 26.577



off-roaderele adevarate au 4WD nu AWD...


--------------------
Civic Si 2007 2.0l DOHC iVTEC
Acura TL 2006 3.2l SOHC VTEC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Valentin50014
post Nov 29 2005, 10:38 AM
Post #162


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 584
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 50.007



Asa e, putem discuta cel mult de SUV-uri


--------------------
Audi A4 130CP - 2002
Panda MultiJet 1,3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
G e o r g e
post Nov 29 2005, 02:09 PM
Post #163


workaholic * * * * * *
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 11.052
Joined: 4-August 03
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 14.854



pai hai sa discutam de suv uri .

forester vs outlander vs crv vs .... completati voi


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrei Suzuki
post Nov 29 2005, 02:48 PM
Post #164


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 4.291
Joined: 17-June 04
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 28.023



Pai ar mai fi vs Tucson/Sportage. Si noul Grand Vitara,da asta nu se pune.


--------------------
2004 Suzuki Ignis 1.3 VVT
2007 Suzuki Swift Sport 1.6 VVT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iulian HondaFan
post Nov 29 2005, 05:17 PM
Post #165


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 4.583
Joined: 30-May 04
From: Honda World
Member No.: 26.577



pey inca nu e clar biggrin.gif . e mai bun quattro sau subaru?


--------------------
Civic Si 2007 2.0l DOHC iVTEC
Acura TL 2006 3.2l SOHC VTEC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Valentin50014
post Nov 29 2005, 06:49 PM
Post #166


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 584
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 50.007



Continuam la SUV-uri. Forester orcum e sucks. biggrin.gif


--------------------
Audi A4 130CP - 2002
Panda MultiJet 1,3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Kilowatt
post Nov 29 2005, 07:03 PM
Post #167


specialist
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 13.667
Joined: 30-June 04
From: Europa
Member No.: 28.666



Toate SUV-urile suck, pe asfalt. Si mai ales, in oras biggrin.gif


--------------------
Scuter 108cc... benzina, automat
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
G e o r g e
post Nov 29 2005, 07:05 PM
Post #168


workaholic * * * * * *
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 11.052
Joined: 4-August 03
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 14.854



nu thãu :angel:

wanna bet ? biggrin.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
f1anatic
post Nov 29 2005, 07:51 PM
Post #169


Subaru Anti-Hero
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5.323
Joined: 13-May 04
From: F 1 World
Member No.: 25.368



Hai muh...nici macar bijuteria aia tehnica de Bemveu X5 ? sau capodopera de Touareg a grupuli VAGue ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
G e o r g e
post Nov 29 2005, 08:13 PM
Post #170


workaholic * * * * * *
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 11.052
Joined: 4-August 03
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 14.854



nici range rover sport ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrei Suzuki
post Nov 29 2005, 08:30 PM
Post #171


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 4.291
Joined: 17-June 04
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 28.023



Mie Range Rover-u Sport mi se pare cel mai misto.Atat ca design cat si tehnica. 2 diferentiale blocabile(nu stiu sigur daca are si pe fata),suspensie pneumatica,TERRAIN RESPONSE... yummi. biggrin.gif


--------------------
2004 Suzuki Ignis 1.3 VVT
2007 Suzuki Swift Sport 1.6 VVT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
f1anatic
post Dec 13 2005, 06:42 AM
Post #172


Subaru Anti-Hero
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5.323
Joined: 13-May 04
From: F 1 World
Member No.: 25.368



http://www.weather.com/multimedia/index.ht...=wxcenter_video

Ma rog...credetzi ce vretzi. Ma duc sa ma culc.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cosmin45741
post Dec 16 2005, 01:49 AM
Post #173


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 992
Joined: 1-May 05
From: Bacau (Bacau)
Member No.: 45.734



apropos de care e cel mai bun: ala de pe bugatti???? blush.gif blush.gif
doar duce 1001 cai si btw: e facut de VAG


--------------------
MAZDA 6 SPORT TOPLINE, 2.0d, 136 cp
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Kilowatt
post Dec 16 2005, 10:32 AM
Post #174


specialist
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 13.667
Joined: 30-June 04
From: Europa
Member No.: 28.666



Are mai mult de 1001CP. CA sa fie omologat la 400km/h au fost nevoiti sa-i modifice aerodinamica pentru a-l stabiliza, si din cauza asta a trebuit sa urce si puterea cu vre-o suta si ceva de cai...
Mie nu mi-e clar daca bugatti are motor vag sau audi are motor bugatti...


--------------------
Scuter 108cc... benzina, automat
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Valentin50014
post Dec 16 2005, 12:37 PM
Post #175


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 584
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 50.007



Gresesti. Motorul lui Veyron maxim are vreo 1020 CP, asta depinde de clima si presiunea atmosferica din locul unde se testeaza. Au spus ca are 1001 CP doar din motive comerciale, 1001 arata mai bine decat 1020. Sutele de cai putere erau necesari daca Veyronul ar fi atins 400 Km/h cu spoilerul ridicat, dar au imbunatatit stabilitatea prin alte metode si nu a mai fost nevoie de asa ceva. De la 370 Km/h, pentru fiecare km/h sunt necesari 8 CP... De aici zvonurile ca motorul are mai mult de 1001 CP.

QUOTE
Mie nu mi-e clar daca bugatti are motor vag sau audi are motor bugatti
Nu prea inteleg ce vrei sa spui aici. VAG a cumparat doar numele "Bugatti" si nimic altceva. Marca era demult moarta. Motorul de pe Veyron este evident ca este fabricat in intregime de VAG daca a fost obtinut din 2 motoare de Passat (si A8). blush.gif


--------------------
Audi A4 130CP - 2002
Panda MultiJet 1,3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iulian HondaFan
post May 15 2006, 05:25 PM
Post #176


specialist
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 4.583
Joined: 30-May 04
From: Honda World
Member No.: 26.577



un text interesant de pe un site finlandez:


QUOTE
Since the launch of the original Audi quattro (also known as "Urquattro"), the Volkswagen-Audi Group have developed, tested and deployed various four-wheel drive systems for their cars.

For years, the systems and the brand names were interchangeable. This changed when VAG introduced the Swedish Haldex clutch as a part-time 4WD solution for their smaller cars with transversely mounted engines. From that moment on, quattro was no longer a system but a brand name for Audi 4WD cars. Conversely, 4motion was introduced as a brand name for VW's 4WD cars. Depending on engine lay-out, quattro and 4motion can now point to both Quattro IV and Haldex systems.

Here's a rundown of VAG's 4WD systems and brand names used over the years. This is followed by a brief explanation of the various types of differentials used by 4WD car manufacturers.

Brand names

Audi: quattro
VW: syncro, followed by 4motion
Seat: 4
Skoda: 4x4

Systems

Quattro I: open front diff, open center diff (manual lock), open rear diff (manual lock). No ABS when locked.

Full-time manually engaged four-wheel drive.

Was on: original Audi quattro (also named "Urquattro"), Audi 80/100 quattro.

Syncro: open front diff, viscous coupling acting as the center diff, open rear diff.

Part-time automatically engaging four-wheel drive.

Was originally developed by Audi, but sourced to VW as "syncro". Similar line of thought to the Haldex system, with the VC engaging rear drive when needed. Crude system with serious drawbacks, such as a lack of ABS integration, which needed the 4WD system to be switched off under braking, using a secondary clutch. Volvo also went on to use it on their earlier Cross-Country models, adding a TC system at the front and an LSD at the back - complicated and flawed. Also on 911 Carrera 4, but then that's originally a RWD car...

Quattro II: open front diff, torque sensing ("torsen") center diff, open rear diff (manually lockable for "those" situations in the rough). No ABS when rear is locked, auto de-lock when speed exceeds 15mph.

Full-time automatically engaged four-wheel drive.

Was on: the Audi quattro ('88-'91, still nicknamed "Urquattro"), Audi 80/90 quattro, Audi 100/200 quattro, Audi Coupé quattro, Audi S2/RS2, Audi S4, Audi S6 (all until '95). Usually seen as the quattro system.

Quattro III: open front diff, torsen center diff (auto version: planetary gear center with electronically controlled multi-plate locking clutch), torsen rear diff.

Full-time automatically engaged four-wheel drive.

Was on: Audi V8/A8 between 1990 and '94. Quattro II further perfected. The ideal all-mechanical system.

Quattro IV: open front diff with Electronic Differential Lock (EDL), torsen center diff, open rear diff with EDL.

Full-time automatically engaged four-wheel drive.

Is on: all VW/Audi cars with longitudinally mounted engines, so A4/A6/A8 quattro, S4/S6/S8, RS4/RS6, Passat 4motion. Quattro with a blend of electronic wizardry, with ABS/ASR sensors acting to detect slipping wheels (the EDL system). First 4WD system which theoretically needs to have all four wheel slipping before it's rendered unmovable.

Haldex: open front diff with EDL, electronically controlled Haldex clutch center, open rear diff with EDL.

Part-time automatically engaging four-wheel drive.

Is on: all VAG cars with transversely mounted engines, so Audi A3 quattro, S3, TT quattro, VW Golf/Bora 4motion, Seat Leon 4, Skoda Octavia 4x4. Normally FWD but Haldex directs torque to the rear when slip occurs to a maximum torque split of 50/50. Is also the system of use in the latest Volvo AWD models (S60, V70, XC70).

Differentials/clutches

Open diffs are the most common type of diff. Wheels (or axles on a 4x4) can turn freely relative to each other. They have no means of balancing power delivery if one wheel has less traction than the other.

Limited-slip diffs (or LSDs) allow the two wheels to turn relative to each other, but limits the rate at which they are allowed to do so (usually either by some sort of friction or fluid coupling). This ensures that, even if one wheel loses traction, some power is still delivered to the other.

Lockable diffs (not to be confused with EDL) physically lock the two half-axles together. This is fine for off-road travel, but can cause problems when trying to turn on high-grip surfaces - one wheel gets "dragged" around.

The electronic differential lock (EDL) employed by VAG is not - as the name suggests - a differential lock at all. Sensors monitor wheel speeds, and if one is rotating substantially faster than the other (i.e. slipping) the EDL system momentarily brakes it. This effectively transfers all the power to the other wheel.

Viscous coupling: invented by British firm Ferguson Formula Developments (FF), the brainchild of Tony Rolt and Freddy Dixon. Silicone liquid in a casing. Increased slip will lead to increase in the liquid's viscosity, thus locking up the coupling. Used by Subaru in conjunction with a regular center diff, so only as a locking device, as opposed to the syncro system, in which it was used as the center diff itself, creating a part-time system. The main problem with VC locks is that they work by sensing rotational differences. Thus they risk not allowing the wheels to run free and seperately under braking. You can see that the integration of ABS, which is relying on precisely that characteristic, has been an engineer's nightmare. The syncro system was simply disconnected during braking. Others reduced the viscosity of the fluid, but this rendered the system less effective, though good enough for 4WD performance road cars. It is much cheaper than torsen, and that's where its main attraction lies. Is found in some form or another in many 4WD cars, Subaru its foremost exponent.

Torsen: invented by American firm Gleason Corp. Stands for TORque SENsing differential. Mechanical device of worm gears and a worm wheel that will split torque 50/50 in a no-slip situation. When one axle slips, the gears will send more torque to the axle with most grip, thus working in the opposite way of a conventional diff. Locking is instantaneous because it's a fully mechanical device. The gears work by sensing differences in torque instead of differences in rotation. This means it will prevent wheelspin instead of reacting and curing it. Also, it won't inadvertently lock under braking, as it will only lock under power. So torsen had all the advantages of the VC but none of its disadvantages. Not only used as a center or rear differential, but also as a "trick" LSD for a sporting FWD car such as the Honda Integra Type-R.

Haldex: developed by Swedish firm Haldex. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. Part-time, but fully automatic solution, directing torque to the rear axle when slip occurs. Compared to syncro, it negates the need for an extra clutch to disconnect the system under braking, so it's much simpler and lighter. Acts within 1/8 of a wheel rotation. Electronics control the precise distribution of torque split. Easy integration with ABS - in fact, ABS is an integral part of the system.

A similar clutch concept using ABS sensors can be seen on 4WD cars with a RWD bias. The original Mercedes 4matic system used a clutch to send power forward, as does the system in the Nissan Skyline GTR (with a no-slip 30/70 split). A computer-controlled center clutch is also the basis for most 4WD cars with an automatic transmission, such as all Subaru auto' cars and the auto' Audi A8/V8. The Honda CR-V has a part-time clutch system as well.

Porsche's Allrad system on the 959 version of the 911 is the most sophisticated variant of the center clutch concept, allowing for variable (instead of fixed) torque split under no-slip conditions, shifting between 20/80 and 40/60, depending on acceleration and straight lining of the car. This was followed by the 964 system, which went back to fixed torque split in no-slip conditions but added a clever computer-controlled lockable rear diff to counter the 911's natural oversteer. Here, the 4WD system wasn't introduced for better traction - a RWD 911 gets off the line pretty good! - but to wipe out the dangerous oversteer that more learned drivers call fun. For the Carrera 4 versions of the 993 and 996 guises of the 911 Porsche went back to a simple VC center diff while retaining the trick rear diff and adding some ESP-style car-balancing computer tweaks. This is a technologically less advanced system than the second Allrad generation.

Finally, the all-electronic 4WD - with an open center diff - has found its way into SUVs like the Mercedes M-class, equating to something like "four-wheel traction control". This is a very simple and cost-cutting system placing excessive demands on the brakes.


--------------------
Civic Si 2007 2.0l DOHC iVTEC
Acura TL 2006 3.2l SOHC VTEC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DORU
post May 16 2006, 09:38 AM
Post #177


Super Moderator
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 8.261
Joined: 11-November 02
From: ORADEA
Member No.: 7.754



Iulian, foarte sintetic articolul. Si numai potrivit pt lamurirea unor chestiuni legate de subiectul topicului... Multumesc!


--------------------


OCTAVIA 1.8T 4X4 - Powered by Dimsport, Milotec, Forge, EBC and Ferodo Racing !

Detalii despre masina mea si Skoda in general pe FORUMUL SKODA-CLUB !

Uneori Dumnezeu ne taie craca de sub picioare ca sa ne aducem aminte ca putem zbura.

"What makes you wise in life is not the success, it's when you go down and come back"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
f1anatic
post May 16 2006, 03:02 PM
Post #178


Subaru Anti-Hero
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5.323
Joined: 13-May 04
From: F 1 World
Member No.: 25.368



QUOTE
The electronic differential lock (EDL) employed by VAG is not - as the name suggests - a differential lock at all. Sensors monitor wheel speeds, and if one is rotating substantially faster than the other (i.e. slipping) the EDL system momentarily brakes it. This effectively transfers all the power to the other wheel.


Pai asta e partea mea favorita. E o "frina" mai desteapta...pe moment.

Cu toate acestea articolul nu este chiar current. Dupa cum am precizat acum citeva saptamini...atit Subaru cit si Porsche (ai naibii boxeristi) au reusit sa faca un diferentzial central cu visco-coupling sa functzioneze cu "Stability Control" - adica au reusit sa "dovedeasca" - citez:

QUOTE
The main problem with VC locks is that they work by sensing rotational differences. Thus they risk not allowing the wheels to run free and seperately under braking. You can see that the integration of ABS, --- ca de altfel si ESP --- which is relying on precisely that characteristic, has been an engineer's nightmare. The syncro system was simply disconnected during braking.
.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Watcher
post May 16 2006, 04:47 PM
Post #179


CFO
******

Group: Membri
Posts: 2.695
Joined: 10-September 04
From: Bucuresti
Member No.: 32.254



Eu am ramas cu o nelamurire inurma articolului proaaspat postat de iulian smile.gif :angel:
Pana acum pe threadulasta s-a zis ca Audi are torsen central si torsen spate cu EDL fata. Acum apare doar torsen central si 2 EDLuri..Pana la coada cum e treaba??


--------------------
Avensis 2.2D4D, PatrolGR RD28TI, cu cutie manuala.
In cautare de masina spectaculoasa, veche si de toata ziua
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
f1anatic
post May 16 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #180


Subaru Anti-Hero
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5.323
Joined: 13-May 04
From: F 1 World
Member No.: 25.368



QUOTE(Watcher)
Eu am ramas cu o nelamurire inurma articolului proaaspat postat de iulian smile.gif :angel:
Pana acum pe threadulasta s-a zis ca Audi are torsen central si torsen spate cu EDL fata. Acum apare doar torsen central si 2 EDLuri..Pana la coada cum e treaba??


Pai Edmunds zice ca au LSD pe spate si EDL pe fatza. BMW-urile au EDL pe ambele puntzi.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Tags
No Tag inserted yet

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2024 - 01:17 PM