In engleza.
Ce parere aveti ?
Pagina principala
http://www.starchildproject.com/
Un punct de plecare bun: Povestea craniului misterios ?
http://www.starchildproject.com/BackgroundAnalysisShort.html

Stiu ca e uncool... dar eu sustin parerea "mainstream" adica saracu prunc a avut ghinionul sa se nasca cu niste malformatii genetice.

S-au mai gasit cranii ciudate,si se spunea ca sunt extraterestrii.
S-a dovedit ca erau anumite triburi nomade,care legau capul copiilor nou nascuti in asa fel ,incat sa primeasca o forme anuma(alungita).Unii zic sa semene cu un caine sau lup.
Cateva exemplare se gasesc si la institutul roman de antropologie.Apartin colectia prifesorului Francisc Rainer.
La fel si acest craniu.Poate si o malformatie genetica sau cine stie ce alt copil chinuit.
Exclus extraterestru.

dar de analiza compozitiei osului de ce nu ziceti nimic .

de forma craniului sa zicem , dar de restul?

Nu stiu.
E posibil sa fie si un fals.
Acum doua sute de ani,a aparaut un craniu de humanoid,care a adus multa publicitate si credite descoperitorului.A fost considerat "The Missing Link"-legatura intre humanoizi si primate.Pe la mijlocul secolului nostru,s-a dovedit ca e un fals.

Uite inca un subiect cu cranii 2 be or not 2 be...
The skull was made from a single block of clear quartz (although the jaw detaches), 5 inches high, 7 inches long and 5 inches wide. It is about the size of a small human cranium, with near perfect detail. In 1970, art restorer Frank Dorland claimed that he was given permission to submit the skull to tests at the internal Hewlett-Packard Laboratories. He claimed that the skull featured some anomalies. According to Dorland, the skull had been carved with total disregard to the natural crystal axis and no metal tools were used. Dorland claimed he was unable to find any tell-tale scratch marks, except for traces of mechanical grinding on the teeth. From tiny patterns near the carved surfaces, Dorland determined it was first chiseled into rough form, probably using diamonds. However, no evidence on this matter has been provided by Hewlett-Packard, so it is doubtful whether these tests were ever carried out. The finer shaping, grinding and polishing, Frederick claimed, was done with sand over a period of 150 to 300 years. Norman Hammond later reported holes, intended for support pegs, drilled by metal. Although various claims have been made over the years regarding the skull's physical properties, such as an allegedly constant temperature of 70°F, Dorland reported that it was no different from other natural quartz crystals. Dorland also claimed that the skull's origin was Atlantis and that it had been carried around by the Knights Templar during the crusades.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skull

Nu vreau sa fiu partizanul ideii ca e extraterestru, de obicei la enigme (m-au pasionat de mic enigmele lumii/universului, alaturi de aero/astronautica) raman undeva in echilibru asteptand noi informatii, nu ma grabesc sa pic in nici una din extreme, dar am impresia ca nici nu te-ai obosit sa citesti explicatiile din al doilea link dat in prima postare. Ma insel ?

Abia acum am citit linkul 2.Nu l-am remarcat prima data.

TOt sunt de parere ca e o malformatie sau un fals.
Teste ADN nu pot fi concludente ptr ca mediul s-a contaminat.
Nu au reusit sa stabileasca acum cativa ani daca o femeie decedata acum 20 de ani in Africa De Sud ,e una din fetele tarului Nicolae.
Asa ca e o descoperire interesanta dar un raspuns exact nu vom avea asa curand.